Created:
Updated:

Thenks Stablecoin Strategy Guide

Link to Research

1. History of Stablecoins: Emergence and Milestones

Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a stable value, typically by pegging to a fiat currency like the US Dollar. They emerged to solve crypto’s volatility problem, enabling the benefits of digital assets without wild price swings. The concept took hold in 2014, a pivotal year for stablecoins:

Today’s Market: Stablecoins have evolved from a sideline idea to cornerstones of the crypto ecosystemblockapps.net. They facilitate the majority of trading volume and are increasingly used in payments and remittances. As of late 2024, the stablecoin market is sizeable (on the order of $120–$130 billion total supply among major coins) and still growing. Importantly, stablecoins now bridge crypto with real-world use: in inflation-hit economies and emerging markets, they are a “safe haven” for preserving value and transacting in stable terms. This history sets the stage for how Thenks can leverage stablecoins’ stability and acceptance going forward.

2. The Current Stablecoin Landscape

Dominant Stablecoins and Networks

The stablecoin space today is led by a few dominant players and spans multiple blockchain networks:

Key Blockchain Networks: Stablecoins live on blockchains, and the choice of network affects speed, cost, and accessibility:

For Thenks, this landscape means two things: (1) We should focus on the major stablecoins (for liquidity and trust) – primarily USDT, USDC, DAI – and incorporate region-specific stablecoins as needed (cUSD, cNGN, etc.). (2) We should utilize the right chains to minimize fees and latency – likely an ensemble of Ethereum L2s, Celo, Stellar, Solana, Tron – abstracted so the user doesn’t need to know which chain is used for their transaction. This multi-chain strategy ensures we can deliver payments that are fast and virtually free, which is crucial for micro-tipping.

Stablecoin Adoption and Traction in Africa

Stablecoins have found particularly strong footing in Africa, where they address many pain points of local currencies and traditional finance. Some key observations:

Implication for Thenks: Africa’s experience shows that stablecoins solve real problems – high fees, slow transfers, currency instability – all of which align with Thenks’ use cases (tipping, donations, cross-border payouts). Traction in Africa also means user education and willingness to use stablecoins is relatively high in many countries, especially among mobile money users and younger populations. For Thenks, focusing on user-friendly stablecoin integrations (mobile wallet connectivity, low fees) will tap into an existing demand. Moreover, regulators in these countries, having seen both the promise and risks, are generally moving from outright bans to frameworks that allow stablecoins under oversight. Being an early, compliant entrant in markets like Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana can position Thenks as a trusted service – potentially even partnering with central banks or sandbox programs that are looking for solutions to make remittances cheaper and payments more inclusive through stablecoins.

In summary, the current stablecoin landscape offers Thenks a powerful toolkit: trusted USD stablecoins (like USDC) for global interoperability, local stablecoins (like cNGN, cXOF) for domestic relevance, and a choice of fast blockchains (Celo, Solana, Base, Stellar, etc.) to minimize costs and latency. Stablecoins are already widely used across Africa for exactly the scenarios Thenks is targeting, providing a strong validation for our strategy – the key is to harness this trend in a regulated, user-centric way to unlock even greater adoption.

3. Stablecoin-Powered Architecture Models for Tipping & Payouts

Using stablecoins in tipping, donations, and cross-border payouts enables near-instant, low-cost transfers. The challenge is to design an architecture that minimizes fees and latency while also minimizing foreign exchange (FX) risk. Below we outline models that Thenks can employ, and how they address those challenges:

A. “Full Stack” Stablecoin Transfer – Fiat to Stablecoin to Fiat (Automated)

In this model, stablecoins operate behind the scenes as a bridge currency. The user experiences a fiat in → fiat out flow with no exposure to crypto volatility. This can be thought of as a fully automated stablecoin sandwich:

  1. Sender pays in local currency: The tipper/donor uses their normal payment methods (credit card, bank transfer, mobile money, etc.) to send value in their home currency. For example, a user in the US funds a $10 tip via credit card in USD, or a user in Kenya pays KES 1,000 via M-Pesa. Thenks’ platform (or its payment partner) receives this fiat money.

  2. Conversion to Stablecoin: Immediately upon receipt, the backend converts the fiat amount to an equivalent stablecoin. This could be done via an exchange or liquidity provider integration. For instance, $10 might be converted to 10 USDC; KES 1,000 might convert to ~$7.50 USDC at current rate (using a forex feed + liquidity pool). This conversion is typically executed by a service provider or an automated market maker integrated into Thenks. The stablecoins are now held by the platform on behalf of the recipient.

  3. On-Chain Transfer: The stablecoin (say USDC) is sent over a blockchain network to the recipient’s jurisdiction. This could mean transferring to a Thenks wallet controlled by the recipient, or simply moving it within the platform’s ledger earmarked for that recipient. Because we’d use a fast, low-cost chain (e.g. Celo, Solana, Layer-2), this on-chain hop is nearly instantaneous and costs maybe fractions of a cent. For example, sending cUSD on Celo or USDC on Solana typically settles in <5 seconds with ~$0.001 fee.

  4. Conversion to recipient’s currency: As soon as the stablecoin arrives, it is converted out to the recipient’s local fiat if the recipient wants a direct payout. Thenks can automate this via local partners. For instance, if the recipient is in Kenya, the 7.50 USDC received can be auto-sold through a service like Kotani Pay, which credits the user’s M-Pesa with KES 1,000 (minus a tiny fee). The recipient essentially gets a mobile money deposit or bank deposit in their currency, without needing to touch crypto themselves.

  5. Delivery to recipient: Finally, the recipient is notified (through SMS/app) that they’ve received the tip/donation in their local currency, which they can withdraw or spend as usual. Total time elapsed might be a minute or two. From the users’ perspective: Sender gave money in their currency, receiver got money in their currency – but the transfer between countries happened via stablecoin rails in the middle.

Advantages: This model minimizes user friction. Neither the sender nor receiver needs to know about stablecoins or manage a wallet. They use familiar interfaces (card payment, mobile wallet, etc.), yet benefit from stablecoin speed/cost. It also inherently minimizes FX exposure time – conversion to stablecoin and then out to fiat happens quickly, so neither Thenks nor the users hold volatile currency for long. We effectively treat stablecoin as a momentary transport layer.

Fees are drastically lower than traditional methods. In a pilot of such a system in Kenya, fees were ~0.5–1% total (including on/off-ramp), versus ~7–10% via banks. Transactions cleared in seconds instead of daystechcrunch.com. Mercy Corps’ study of this model showed a 93% reduction in fees for cross-border micropaymentstechcrunch.com. Stablecoins also cut out multiple intermediaries (no correspondent banks each taking a cut).

Considerations: The challenge is on Thenks’ side to manage liquidity and compliance. We need reliable partners or reserves for converting fiat to stablecoin and vice versa. For example, Thenks might hold some float in USDC and various local currencies to instantly exchange value. Tapping multiple liquidity sources (exchanges, OTC desks) ensures we get good FX rates and low slippage. Compliance-wise, Thenks in this model is acting as a money transmitter, so we must perform KYC on users and monitor transactions for AML – essentially the platform takes on the regulatory responsibilities while users get simplicity.

Real-world analogue: Think of TransferWise/Wise (fintech remittance service) – users send local money to Wise, Wise internally shifts funds and pays out locally on the other side. Here, stablecoins play the role of Wise’s internal ledger, but with the efficiency of blockchain and without needing pre-funded bank accounts in every country. In fact, our architecture might combine with pre-funding: e.g., Thenks could maintain balances with payout partners (mobile money operators) and use stablecoins to refill those balances as needed, just-in-time.

Diagram: The flow can be visualized like this – Sender (fiat) → [Convert to Stablecoin] → Stablecoin transfer → [Convert to fiat] → Recipient. The diagram below illustrates how stablecoins bridge the two fiat systems in a cross-border payout.

This full fiat-stablecoin-fiat pipeline is ideal for users who just want fast payouts with no new learning curve. Thenks could offer this as the default “instant payout” option. For example, a Kenyan content creator receiving tips would automatically see them in shillings in her M-Pesa; the app would say “You got KES 500 from a fan in the US” and she can spend it immediately. Under the hood, Thenks handled USDC behind the scenes.

Latency & Fee Minimization: By choosing efficient networks and automating conversions, this model squeezes out costs at each step. Instead of SWIFT fees ($30-$50) and currency conversion fees (~3-10%), we have: card or mobile money fee (perhaps 1-2% or a flat few cents), blockchain fee (~$0.001, negligible), and conversion spread (maybe 0.5%). In practice, Thenks could often charge users ~1-3% or a small flat fee and still be profitable, while dramatically undercutting traditional services. The speed is near real-time; any remaining latency comes from payment method (e.g., a credit card authorization might take 30 seconds, M-Pesa API might take a few seconds to confirm deposit).

FX Exposure: The platform carries momentary FX exposure during the transaction. For instance, if we lock in a rate for USD<>KES when the sender initiates, and within those minutes the forex rate moves, Thenks might lose or gain slightly. But this can be hedged by having liquidity providers execute nearly concurrently. Additionally, since stablecoins are mostly USD-based, Thenks can choose to denominate the transfer in USD stablecoin and only do the final conversion to KES at payout, using up-to-the-minute rates. This just-in-time conversion model means we’re not holding volatile currency for long – we either hold stable USD, or if we hold a local currency float, we can minimize how much we hold (e.g., enough for a day’s payouts, and regularly refill it via stablecoin as needed).

Overall, this fully automated stablecoin rail provides the fastest, simplest user experience with stablecoins, at the cost of Thenks handling all complexity. Many users will prefer this “cash-out immediately” style, especially recipients who may not be crypto-savvy or who need funds for daily expenses.

B. Open Stablecoin Wallets – End-to-End in Stablecoin (User-Controlled)

The second model gives more control (and potentially more benefits) to the users by keeping funds in stablecoin form until the user chooses to convert. This can be described as an “open” stablecoin sandwich or user-driven modeldynamic.xyz. Here’s how it works:

  1. Sender funds in currency or crypto: The tipper can still pay in fiat (Thenks converts it to stablecoin as before) or the sender might directly pay in stablecoin if they have it. For instance, a donor could send USDC from their MetaMask wallet to Thenks, indicating it’s for a certain recipient/cause. Thenks records that incoming stablecoin.

  2. Funds credited in stablecoin to recipient: Instead of auto-converting out, the recipient is credited, say, 10 USDC in their Thenks wallet/balance. The recipient now effectively holds a stablecoin balance (custodial or semi-custodial) worth that much. The app might show “You have $10 (≈ KES 1,330) in your Thenks wallet.”

  3. Recipient chooses outcome: The recipient has multiple options for what to do with the stablecoins:

    • Instant Cash-Out: If they need the money immediately in hand, they can withdraw to their bank or mobile money (triggering the conversion to fiat, similar to Model A’s final step). This would be a manual action they take.

    • Store as Savings: They might leave the funds in the stablecoin wallet, effectively treating it like a dollar savings account. This is attractive in high-inflation environments – e.g., a Nigerian user might keep tips in USDC for months to hedge against naira depreciation.

    • Spend Directly (Crypto or Card): Thenks could offer a debit card linked to the stablecoin balance, or integration with payment platforms, so the user can spend stablecoins at merchants. For example, a virtual or physical card that deducts USDC and settles with Visa/MasterCard network (some fintechs do this already). Alternatively, if the user is somewhat crypto-aware, they could transfer the stablecoin to an external wallet to use in DeFi or other crypto apps.

    • Partial Actions: The user might split funds – e.g., immediately cash out half to pay bills and keep half in stablecoin to hold or invest.

  4. Conversion at user’s discretion: When the user opts to cash out or spend in fiat, Thenks (or partners) perform the stablecoin-to-fiat conversion on demand. The rate applied would be current FX rate. Because the user initiated it, they are implicitly okay with that rate/timing.

Benefits: This model empowers recipients and can maximize the value they get:

Challenges: The open model is more complex for the user than Model A. Not everyone will be comfortable holding stablecoins. It requires trust in Thenks (or the wallet provider) to safeguard those stablecoins. There are also regulatory considerations: holding a user’s funds as stablecoin might be seen as issuing a stored-value or e-money. We would likely need appropriate licenses (e.g., an EMI license in EU or trust charter in US) to lawfully offer ongoing custody of user funds (more on compliance in section 5). Also, if users hold significant funds, Thenks must have strong security – a hack or theft of stablecoin balances would be devastating to trust.

Hybrid Approach: Thenks can combine both models: By default, small tips or donations could flow through Model A (auto-converted to fiat for immediate use), especially if the recipient is not yet on-boarded to a crypto wallet. However, we can offer an “opt-in wallet” where users who want can switch to Model B. For example, during onboarding a content creator might choose “Keep my earnings in a USD wallet” or “Auto-convert to local currency on receipt.” This user choice would cater to both preferences.

Many might start with auto-conversion (low complexity), but over time, as they see the benefits or become more crypto-savvy, they may opt to hold in stablecoin. We can educate them gently: e.g., show “If you kept your tips in USD last month, you’d have X% more value given local inflation” – thus encouraging adoption of stablecoin holding.

Latency: Model B doesn’t force conversion latency; the on-chain part is still instant. The user might experience zero latency if they keep it in stablecoin (since we credit instantly and they are done). When they eventually cash out, that’s one more step for them – but it’s on their terms.

FX exposure: In this model, the user chooses the FX timing, effectively managing their own FX exposure. If they anticipate their currency weakening, they can hold USD stablecoin indefinitely (no FX loss). If their local currency is stable or strengthening (rarer case, but say some policy change strengthens it), they might cash out sooner. Either way, Thenks isn’t taking FX risk here; the user is, by virtue of deciding when to convert. We just need to ensure transparent rates and low conversion fees when they do.

Example to illustrate Model B: Consider a Rwandan NGO receives donations via Thenks. They opt to keep funds in USDC within Thenks. Over 6 months, the Rwandan franc quietly inflates at say 5%. The NGO then converts to RWF right when they need to spend, effectively having 5% more local purchasing power than if they’d converted immediately on receipt. On top of that, suppose Thenks integrated a yield service and they earned 3% APY on the dollars in those 6 months – they come out even further ahead. This showcases how strategic timing and earning with stablecoins can amplify impact, a selling point for certain users.

C. Network and Architecture Considerations for Minimizing Fees, Latency, and FX Exposure

Regardless of model (automated vs. open), some common architectural techniques ensure we meet the goals of low fee, low latency, low FX risk:

By combining these design choices, Thenks can achieve transactions that feel instantaneous to users and cost mere cents (or fractions), even across borders. For example, in the Mercy Corps Kenya pilot using Celo, participants were paid within 5 seconds with a fee of ~$0.01, then could cash out to mobile money at will. That’s the kind of performance we aim for.

Moreover, stablecoins eliminate multi-currency juggling because we can standardize on a stable unit (USD) for transport. This avoids multiple FX conversions. If donor currency != recipient currency, traditionally you convert at both ends; with stablecoins, you often convert only once (donor currency to USD stablecoin, and that stablecoin serves directly until the recipient converts to their local currency). Less conversion = less cost and less exposure.

In conclusion, the architecture for Thenks will likely blend the Automated Model for simplicity and the Open Wallet Model for flexibility, built on a multi-chain, multi-currency backend optimized for low cost and fast throughput. This ensures tips and donations can move instantly and cheaply, while giving users control to avoid FX losses. The next sections will discuss how we implement this with the help of existing infrastructure providers, and how we navigate the regulatory side to make this globally scalable.

4. White-Label Infrastructure and Providers for Stablecoin Integration

Building a complex payments platform from scratch is unnecessary (and unwise) when there are many specialized providers offering APIs and white-label services for key pieces. Thenks can accelerate development and compliance by leveraging such infrastructure for wallet management, on/off ramps, liquidity, and regulatory compliance. Below we identify major categories of providers and notable examples in each:

A. Wallet Creation and Custody Providers

Every Thenks user will need a crypto wallet (even if abstracted). Rather than building our own secure wallet infrastructure, we can use Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solutions:

By partnering with a wallet provider, Thenks can ensure that user wallets are created instantly and transactions are signed securely, without building our own HSMs or key vaults. This also helps with compliance – many of these providers have SOC 2 compliance, ISO27001, etc., showing we handle customer assets responsibly.

Example Integration: Suppose Thenks uses Fireblocks. When a user signs up, Fireblocks SDK creates a new wallet for them (actually an address on each blockchain we need). That address is linked to the user in our database. When the user sends or receives stablecoins, Fireblocks handles the cryptographic signing under the hood, enforcing any whitelists or limits we set. We get webhooks for incoming transfers, etc. This way, we outsource the heavy lifting of secure key storage and blockchain interaction while retaining full control via API.

B. On/Off-Ramping and Fiat Integration (especially to Mobile Money)

Getting fiat into and out of the crypto/stablecoin world is crucial. Different regions require different ramp solutions:

On-Ramp Example: A content creator in Kenya wants to cash out her tips to M-Pesa. Through Kotani Pay’s API: Thenks would call Kotani.transfer(amount: 50 cUSD, to: +2547xxxxxxxx) – Kotani would handle converting 50 cUSD (Celo Dollar) to Kenyan Shillings at a known rate and push 50 * 130 = KES 6,500 to that M-Pesa number. The creator gets an SMS from M-Pesa: “You have received 6,500 KES”. Kotani charges perhaps 1% for this service (just as an example), which could be built into Thenks’ fee or slightly deducted, but it’s minimal compared to traditional routes.

Off-Ramp Example: A donor in the US with no crypto knowledge wants to tip $5. Thenks could embed Stripe’s onramp. The donor enters card details, Stripe processes and delivers 5 USDC to Thenks’ wallet (Stripe handles conversion at mid-market FX if the card is not USD). In seconds, the donor’s $5 becomes stablecoin in the system. If 100 donors do this simultaneously, Stripe abstracts the heavy lifting and deposits crypto accordingly, saving us from dealing with each issuer or bank.

By smartly combining these on/off-ramp solutions, Thenks can offer localized experiences: e.g., a user in Kenya sees “Withdraw to M-Pesa”, a user in the UK sees “Withdraw to Bank (Faster Payments)”, a user in Nigeria sees “Withdraw to your bank or USDT wallet”, etc., all under a unified Thenks interface. White-label providers handle the messy integrations with telco APIs, banking networks, etc.

C. Liquidity, Swap, and FX Providers

Ensuring that stablecoins can be converted to different currencies (fiat or crypto) with minimal spread is a key part of minimizing costs. Rather than Thenks trying to be its own trader, we can plug into liquidity networks:

In practice, white-label liquidity providers allow Thenks to operate almost like a forex broker without taking on those operations. For instance, Dynamic’s stablecoin payments guide notes businesses often use providers like Circle, ZeroHash, or on-chain DEXs to source stablecoins and off-ramp fiatdynamic.xyz. We will do the same. One API call might be “sell 10,000 USDC for Kenyan Shillings at best rate” – a provider might return a quote and, upon acceptance, handle the trade across their network (maybe matching us with someone wanting to buy USDC). The result: we get KES in a local bank or mobile money account. All this can happen within seconds for small amounts or hours for large (depending on banking hours).

Cost impact: By using multiple providers and aggregating, Thenks ensures users get near-market FX rates. For popular corridors (USD/KES, USD/NGN, USD/ZAR, USD/GHS, etc.), the effective markup can be kept to a few basis points or at most 1-2%. This is far below traditional remittance FX spreads, which are often 4-6% hidden in the rate. Lower costs for us mean we either pass savings to users (to be very competitive) or maintain a small margin.

D. Compliance and Regulatory Tech Support

Operating a cross-border payment platform with crypto, Thenks must take compliance seriously from day one. Fortunately, there are white-label solutions to help with KYC (Know Your Customer), AML (Anti-Money Laundering), transaction monitoring, and even licensing:

Implementing these from the start not only keeps Thenks out of legal trouble, but can be a selling point. Users and partners will trust a platform that shows it uses top-tier compliance tech – e.g., “All transactions are monitored with Chainalysis to prevent illicit use” gives comfort. It can also fast-track regulatory approvals if we can demonstrate we have these controls in place.

Example: When a user in the US sends $1000 (above a threshold) to someone in Kenya, Thenks’ system will attach sender/receiver info internally. If required by regulation, we’d share that with the Kenyan partner or via a Travel Rule protocol to the recipient’s institution. Our compliance engine might flag if, say, this is an anomalously large tip for that user or if the pattern looks like structuring (avoiding thresholds). A compliance officer could review such flags via a dashboard provided by the analytics tool. If something seems off (e.g., a series of large donations from one person with known political exposure), we can file a Suspicious Transaction Report to authorities proactively.

By outsourcing much of the heavy compliance lifting to experts (through APIs and software), Thenks can remain lean. We’ll still need an internal compliance team to make decisions, but they’ll be armed with data and tools that automate the grunt work.

E. Summary of Key Providers (Table)

To concisely organize, here’s a table of example providers and their role:

Infrastructure Need Provider Examples Functionality for Thenks
Wallet Creation & Custody Fireblocks, BitGo, Circle Wallet API, CryptoAPIs Create secure user wallets; manage keys and sign blockchain txns.
Non-Custodial Wallet SDK Web3Auth, Magic.link, Argent smart wallets Enable user-controlled wallets with easy login (optional feature).
Fiat On-Ramp (Card/Bank) Stripe Onramp, MoonPay, Transak, Onramper, Wyre Let users buy stablecoins with cards/bank transfer in-app.
Mobile Money On/Off-Ramp Kotani Pay, BitLipa, Yellow Card API, Chipper Cash API Convert stablecoin ↔ M-Pesa, Airtel Money, etc. for local payout.
Cash-Out to Cash MoneyGram Access (Stellar), Western Union pilot Exchange USDC for physical cash pickup in multiple countries.
FX Liquidity & Stablecoin Swap Circle (USDC convert), Zero Hash, Cumberland, Binance OTC Swap between fiat and stablecoins; get best FX rates for conversionsdynamic.xyz.
Decentralized Liquidity Uniswap / DEXs, Celo’s Mento, 1inch aggregator On-chain swaps between stablecoins or to local crypto (for algorithmic routing).
KYC Verification Jumio, Sumsub, Onfido, Veriff Verify user identities (ID documents, selfies) to onboard users.
AML Blockchain Monitoring Chainalysis KYT, Elliptic, TRM Labs Flag risky addresses or transactions; comply with anti-crime rules.
Sanctions/PEP Screening ComplyAdvantage, World-Check, LexisNexis Bridger Check users against sanctions and politically exposed persons lists.
Travel Rule Compliance Notabene, Sygna Bridge, TRISA Securely transmit sender/receiver info for large crypto transfers.
License Partnerships Zero Hash (US), Local EMI (EU), Banking Circle, Modulr Operate under partners’ licenses for fiat custody or transmission.
Payment Processing & Cards Railsr (formerly Railsbank), Stripe Issuing, Marqeta Issue Thenks-branded debit cards linked to stablecoin balance; handle card payments.
Reporting & Analytics Elliptic Lens (case mgmt), Crystal Blockchain, ComplianceWise Tools to aggregate and report transactions to regulators (e.g., SAR filing).

Table: Key white-label and infrastructure providers that Thenks can leverage. (Note: We will cite relevant sources inline above rather than in the table to comply with formatting rules.)

By assembling these modular services, Thenks can focus on its core product experience (facilitating tips/donations) rather than reinventing the wheels of crypto custody, exchange, and compliance. For instance, Kotani Pay’s integration with Celo and M-Pesa ensures transactions have “minimal fees and fast settlement”, exactly what we need for micro-payouts. Using such services, Thenks can offer near-instant mobile payouts while outsourcing the heavy lifting to a specialist.

In summary, the strategy is to buy vs build for most infrastructure: buy (integrate) the wallet security, the ramps, the liquidity, and the compliance tools – build the user-facing app and business logic that ties it together for tipping and donations. This gives us a robust, scalable backend from day one, and credibility through association with known providers (e.g., “custody secured by BitGo, compliance by Chainalysis” can reassure users and regulators). As volume grows, we can evaluate bringing some pieces in-house (for cost or independence), but the available white-label ecosystem now is rich enough to launch and scale efficiently.

5. Regulatory Pathways to Scale Globally

Operating a platform like Thenks across multiple countries means navigating a complex regulatory mosaic. We need to ensure compliance in each jurisdiction where we send or receive funds. Below we outline key regulatory pathways and licenses – in North America, Europe, and Africa – that Thenks should pursue or leverage to operate legally and scale globally.

A. North America – Money Service Business (MSB) Registration and Licenses

United States: In the US, activities involving money transmission, currency exchange, or issuing payment instruments typically require licensure. For crypto, the baseline is FinCEN MSB registration at the federal level. FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) classifies the transmission of “value that substitutes for currency” (which includes stablecoins) as money transmission. Any company transmitting stablecoins on behalf of others is an MSB (Money Services Business) and must:

FinCEN registration alone, however, is not sufficient to operate in the U.S. Because the U.S. is unique (and rather notorious) for requiring state-by-state money transmitter licenses (MTLs) for non-bank payment companies. Each state has its own MTL regime (with certain clusters following similar rules). To legally serve customers in a state (taking their fiat and sending out value), Thenks might need that state’s MTL.

Given the complexity, a common approach is: get FinCEN MSB registration immediately (signal compliance intent), then either secure a license in a friendly state as home base (e.g., a dozen companies incorporate in Wyoming or Montana for crypto-friendly law) and/or partner with a licensed MSB for the rest. Over time, if US becomes a big market, invest in acquiring the major state licenses (starting with large states like Texas, Florida, Illinois, etc. and New York’s BitLicense if needed).

Canada: Canada has a more centralized approach. The federal regulator FINTRAC requires any business “dealing in virtual currencies” (exchange or transfer) to register as an MSB or Foreign MSB. Since June 2020, crypto platforms are explicitly under FINTRAC. So, Thenks must:

In both US and Canada, securities laws could come into play if any stablecoin or crypto asset we handle is deemed a security. Stablecoins like USDC/USDT are generally not considered securities (they’re more like stored value), so we avoid that complication. We will, however, avoid any algorithmic or interest-bearing stablecoins in the US for now, to be safe (e.g., we wouldn’t offer a product that could be seen as an investment contract without proper registration).

Summary for NA: Thenks should quickly get FinCEN and FINTRAC registration (this signals commitment to compliance). Build a solid AML program from the start (as detailed in section 4). In parallel, use a regulatory hosting strategy for US state licenses (Zero Hash or similar)dynamic.xyz. For example, Thenks could integrate with a custodian that already has e.g. 30 state licenses; all user funds go through that custodian’s entity, which technically performs the transmission, with Thenks as an agent. Many crypto fintechs use this approach initially. Meanwhile, we’ll start preparing for getting our own licenses in key states if needed, especially if we want to reduce dependency on partners and appear directly regulated to build trust.

B. Europe and UK – Electronic Money Institution (EMI) and Beyond

United Kingdom: Post-Brexit, the UK is crafting its own crypto regulation, but it has indicated that fiat-backed stablecoins used for payments will be brought into the payments regulatory perimeter. In practice, currently stablecoin activity can fall under Electronic Money Regulations (EMRs) or Payment Services if structured a certain way:

The practical step: Obtain an EMI license in the UK (or EU). This is a significant undertaking but yields big benefits:

We could also consider getting licensed in an EU country and using passporting to the UK or vice versa. However, after Brexit, UK and EU are separate regulatory spaces, so one would need both if operating widely. A strategy some fintechs use is: get an EMI license in Lithuania or Ireland (faster regulators) for EU market (MiCA coming but EMI still relevant for fiat aspects), and get at least a small API (Authorized Payment Institution) or Small EMI registration in the UK then upgrade as needed.

The UK’s new stablecoin regime: The UK’s Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2023 created a category “Digital Settlement Assets (DSAs)” which includes stablecoins. Secondary legislation (expected by 2024/25) will require stablecoin-based payment systems to possibly get recognition by Bank of England if systemic, and FCA authorization for firms dealing in them. This likely means Thenks, if facilitating stablecoin payments at scale, will need to be authorized similarly to a Payment Institution or something under this new category. Essentially, getting an EMI/API now positions us well to transition into whatever new permission is needed for stablecoin services.

European Union: The big framework is MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), which comes into effect in 2024. Under MiCA:

However, aside from MiCA, to handle fiat on/off ramps in EU, an EMI/PI license is necessary. For example, if Thenks wants to have a Euro-denominated customer account or do SEPA transfers, it either needs its own license or a partnership with an EMI (like working with a company such as SatchelPay (Lithuania) or Bankable to sponsor us). Many crypto firms in EU have gone the route of getting an EMI in crypto-friendly places (e.g., Revolut got one in Lithuania).

Timeline and approach: MiCA CASP licenses will likely begin in 2024–2025. It might be efficient to apply for EMI in one EU country (which can take 6-12 months), and simultaneously ensure MiCA compliance. Or, partner with a regulated entity like Binance (they acquired an EMI in EU) or Ramp Network (EMI agent) for interim.

Safeguarding and Consumer Protection: Under EMI rules, any user funds held overnight must be safeguarded (held in a separate bank or invested in safe liquid assets). Thenks will implement that – e.g., if we hold $100k of user stablecoin float, we might mirror that with $100k in a trust account or in USDC reserves we could redeem. This ensures even if Thenks goes bust, users’ money is safe – a key legal requirement and also just good practice.

Summary for UK/EU: Aim to get an EMI license (or PI) to cover the traditional money aspects and be ready for MiCA CASP authorization for the crypto aspects. Until then, use agents or partnerships for interim compliance. The EMI license in particular unlocks a lot: we could then issue Thenks-branded e-money (which could even be considered a stablecoin if we tokenized it) and integrate with banking systems directly. It’s a longer road but important for global credibility.

C. African Markets – VASP Registration, PSP Licenses, and Sandboxes

Africa is a patchwork of regulators at different stages of crypto rules. Thenks will target compliance in each major market:

Sandbox and Industry Engagement: Across these jurisdictions, making use of sandboxes (where available) is a recurring strategy. Nigeria had one for payments (CBN’s sandbox), Kenya CMA’s sandbox, Ghana’s, Rwanda’s, MAS in Singapore, even the UK FCA’s sandbox has admitted crypto companies in the past. Sandboxes allow controlled testing with regulatory waivers. Thenks should prepare proposals tailored to each sandbox’s goals (e.g., financial inclusion in Africa, or new payment methods in UK) and apply. Sandboxes often provide a semi-official “approval” to operate temporarily, which can then ease formal licensing.

Local Entity Setup: We will likely incorporate subsidiaries or branches in each key country or region to obtain licenses (e.g., Thenks Kenya Ltd., Thenks Nigeria Ltd.). Many countries require local incorporation for certain licenses. We’ll ensure good governance and local compliance officers in each region.

Compliance and Reporting Harmonization: Obtaining these licenses means Thenks will be reporting to multiple regulators. We’ll have to produce periodic reports (transaction volumes, any suspicious activities, safeguarding audits, etc.). Using unified compliance tools will let us generate these easily. Also, capital requirements from various licenses might stack, so we need to maintain a healthy capital buffer.

D. Countries Leading in Stablecoin Regulation/Adoption (Overview)

(This section directly ties into item 6 of the prompt, but since we have largely covered regulatory stance and adoption in previous sections, here we’ll briefly highlight each country asked: Nigeria, Kenya, S. Africa, Ghana, Rwanda, UAE, Singapore, UK – summarizing their leadership in either regulation or adoption.)

Nigeria: A leader in adoption and now moving to lead in regulation. Nigeria has one of the highest crypto usage rates globally, largely through stablecoins as a hedge and for commerce. The launch of the cNGN stablecoin with CBN’s blessing in 2024 makes Nigeria one of the first countries to officially sanction a private stablecoin. That, combined with emerging VASP guidelines, puts Nigeria ahead in creating a framework where stablecoins can operate within the financial system. Nigeria is essentially using stablecoins to solve real problems (FX access), and regulators are adapting to that reality faster than many peers. Thenks can view Nigeria as a bellwether: proving a model there could open doors across the continent.

Kenya: Kenya’s population is extremely fintech-savvy, and stablecoin volumes (over $2B annual) are significant. While formal regulation lags (the VASP bill pending), Kenya is de facto a hub of stablecoin activity (for remittances, gig work, etc.). The government’s openness to sandbox tests and the probable legalization of crypto services via the new law will likely make Kenya a friendly environment soon. Kenya’s situation – high mobile money use, inflation concern, tech innovation – makes it a natural for stablecoin solutions. It’s a country to watch for innovative pilots (like the Mercy Corps microwork project) that can be scaled up. Regulators are beginning to engage (as shown by the tax law and draft bill), so in 1-2 years Kenya could move from grey area to a fully regulated market for stablecoins.

South Africa: SA stands out for having a clear regulatory stance early (treating crypto as a financial product) and for local innovation like ZARP (Rand stablecoin) which is regulated and backed by local assets. South Africa’s Reserve Bank and FSCA are actively integrating crypto into the existing legal framework rather than banning it. It’s ahead in that it already requires compliance (FSP licenses) – meaning the market is moving from Wild West to governed, which ultimately attracts more institutional usage. South Africa’s relatively robust financial infrastructure means a stablecoin like ZARP can plug into banks (Old Mutual holds reserves). We expect South Africa may formalize stablecoin-specific rules (perhaps requiring approval to issue a ZAR stablecoin, etc.) but they are building on top of strong financial regulations. As the most industrialized African nation, if SA fully legalizes stablecoin use in payments, it could serve as a template for others. Notably, SA has been exploring wholesale stablecoins or CBDC through Project Khokha – so they are conceptually on board with tokenized money. For Thenks, SA may have higher compliance burden but also potentially large pay-out corridors (e.g., a lot of remittances to neighboring countries, and SA’s business presence in Africa could drive stablecoin flows).

Ghana: Ghana was one of the first African central banks to pilot a CBDC (eCedi) and is unique in actively exploring hybrid models involving stablecoins. The fact that Ghana invited a stablecoin (XSGD) to pair with its CBDC in a cross-border test shows they acknowledge the utility of stablecoins for international commerce. Regulatory-wise, Ghana is formulating rules – not as fast as Nigeria or SA, but likely in the next year or two. Ghana’s fintech sandbox and draft guidelines put it slightly ahead of many peers who haven’t started on crypto regulations. Adoption in Ghana isn’t as huge as Nigeria, but the government’s proactive projects (like that SME trade project with Singapore) could accelerate usage in a safe manner. Ghana might become an example of public-private coexisting, with eCedi for local use and stablecoins for cross-border or other functions. If Ghana issues friendly final rules (perhaps licensing exchanges and allowing stablecoin remittances under oversight), it could leapfrog in West Africa as a crypto hub (especially given Nigeria’s banking restrictions historically, some companies might prefer Ghana as a base).

Rwanda: Rwanda is often forward-looking, though smaller. It hasn’t made big headlines in crypto, but the mention in the Ghana-Singapore project is significant. It means the Rwandan central bank is willing to experiment with stablecoins in a regional context. Rwanda also strives to be a financial hub (Kigali International Financial Centre initiative), so it wouldn’t be surprising if they craft crypto-friendly regulations to attract business. They might be inspired by neighbors: Kenya’s bill, Uganda had a recent law categorizing crypto as digital assets, etc. Rwanda’s ahead in mindset – they see tech as a development tool. Once they set a framework, stablecoins could find fertile ground especially for NGO and cross-border trade uses (Rwanda relies on trade and has many NGOs that could use crypto for aid distribution).

UAE: The United Arab Emirates (particularly Dubai and Abu Dhabi) is globally leading in establishing a comprehensive licensing regime for crypto and stablecoins. ADGM was among the first to regulate crypto businesses in 2018, and Dubai’s VARA in 2022/23 issued arguably the most detailed rulebook to date for digital asset service providers. The UAE is ahead in that it actively welcomes crypto businesses (issuing licenses to Binance, Crypto.com, etc.) and is aligning with international standards (UAE’s central bank is a member of global stablecoin discussions). However, they are also specific: algorithmic stablecoins are banned and foreign currency stablecoins for local payments are restricted. That indicates they want to protect their monetary sovereignty (hence pushing for AED-backed stablecoins and likely a future CBDC). The UAE also has deep liquidity and interest in using stablecoins for cross-border trade (many UAE companies trade with Asia/Africa where stablecoins can ease transactions). The recent VAT exemption for crypto transactions in Nov 2024 shows the government wants to encourage usage by removing tax friction. Overall, the UAE is positioning itself as a regulated haven for crypto, stablecoins included, bridging Western, Asian, and African markets. For Thenks, getting into that ecosystem means access to a hub of innovation and capital (e.g., fundraising opportunities, partnerships with UAE fintechs doing remittances, etc.).

Singapore: Singapore’s MAS is arguably one of the most knowledgeable regulators on stablecoins. By finalizing a stablecoin framework in 2023, MAS is ahead of most Western regulators (the US still has no specific stablecoin law). They set clear standards: e.g., issuers of Singapore-dollar or G10 currency stablecoins must meet value stability and capital requirements. Singapore also strictly licenses crypto service providers under the PSA – only a few dozen have received full licenses so far, showing MAS’s high bar. Yet, Singapore is pro-innovation: it funds blockchain projects, fosters industry sandboxes, and encourages banks to experiment (DBS bank launched its own stablecoin pilot, etc.). The combination of stringency and support makes Singapore a model environment. In adoption, Singapore is not about retail need (its currency is stable and payments are efficient domestically), but about institutional and cross-border use. MAS’s Project Guardian is even exploring DeFi with real-world assets, including possibly use of stablecoins. For Thenks, being regulated in Singapore would be a gold stamp of approval and open connections to Asia-Pacific markets. Singapore could also be a gateway to partnerships in other ASEAN countries that look up to MAS guidelines. Already, Singapore’s XSGD stablecoin by StraitsX is one of the largest non-USD stablecoins; MAS hasn’t objected to it, implying well-collateralized stablecoins are welcome. Singapore will likely become a global hub for stablecoin issuers (Circle chose it for its Asia HQ, etc.). Thenks should take cues from MAS’s rules (like ensuring any stablecoins we use have proper reserves and audits) to align with top-tier standards.

UK: The UK, after a slow start, is now moving fast to integrate stablecoins into its regulatory perimeter. The new legislation drafts (as of 2025) indicate the UK will treat certain stablecoins as a form of payment money, potentially bringing them under the Bank of England’s oversight if they become systemic, and the FCA’s oversight for conduct. The UK already has a large fintech sector itching to use stablecoins for settlement (e.g., Checkout.com piloted stablecoin settlement with merchants). HMT’s statements show they see stablecoins as “significant in payments” and they’ve committed to enabling their use. The UK is ahead in the policy thinking – e.g., considering EMI-style regulation for stablecoin issuers and explicit recognition in e-money and payments laws. In adoption, stablecoins are used in trading, but we might see British pound-pegged stablecoins being utilized in domestic fintech soon (one is already live, as mentioned). The UK’s pragmatic approach (not banning, but regulating) and its influence on Commonwealth countries mean its stance could set an example. If the UK successfully implements a regime where you can pay with regulated stablecoins at shops or online, that would greatly validate the concept globally. Thenks obtaining UK licenses and possibly participating in pilot programs (the Bank of England has discussed a sandbox for new payments) will keep us at the forefront. Also, London as a financial center means partnership opportunities with banks who are exploring stablecoin settlements for faster interbank or cross-border transfers.

In conclusion, to scale globally Thenks needs to be licensed or authorized wherever necessary: MSB in North America, EMI/crypto licenses in UK/EU, and appropriate licenses in each African target (VASP, PSP, etc.), as well as other hubs like UAE and Singapore. This is a non-trivial amount of compliance work, but it’s the price of becoming a trusted, long-term player in the space. The payoff is that with these approvals, Thenks can operate with regulatory blessing, integrate with banks and payment networks, and attract partnerships that wouldn’t be possible if we stayed informal. It’s about bridging the crypto and traditional finance worlds, and that requires speaking the language of regulators and obeying their rules in each jurisdiction.

By actively engaging regulators (through sandboxes, consultation responses, etc.) and demonstrating a compliance-first mindset (e.g., “we will register as an MSB, obtain EMI, follow MiCA, etc.”), Thenks not only avoids legal roadblocks but actually builds a moat – newer competitors may find it hard to replicate the network of licenses and trust we accumulate. This effort turns regulation from a challenge into a competitive advantage.

6. Country Spotlights: Stablecoin Regulation and Adoption Leadership

(As part of the strategic guide, we provide a detailed overview of countries that are ahead in stablecoin regulation or adoption, incorporating insights from earlier sections.)

Nigeria: Pioneering Stablecoin Adoption and Regulation

Adoption: Nigeria is one of the world’s top markets for cryptocurrency, and stablecoins are at the heart of that trend. Faced with a volatile naira and limited access to USD, Nigerians have turned to USDT and USDC en masse. Stablecoins are used for preserving wealth and fueling commerce – from everyday people protecting their savings, to businesses paying overseas suppliers. Nigeria’s crypto transaction volume (especially on P2P platforms) consistently ranks among the highest globally, with stablecoins estimated to make up a large chunk of that (Chainalysis noted Nigeria drove a significant portion of Africa’s 40%+ stablecoin transfer growth). Essentially, Nigerians have normalized using digital dollars as a workaround for fiat issues.

Regulation: Despite an initial hostile stance (the 2021 banking ban), Nigeria’s regulators have pivoted to engagement and innovation. The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) launched the eNaira CBDC, but more relevant is its support for a private stablecoin, cNGN. In Jan 2024, the CBN approved the Africa Stablecoin Consortium’s NGN stablecoin (cNGN) – a 1:1 naira-backed token managed by a group of local banks/fintechs. This is groundbreaking: Nigeria could be the first country where a stablecoin not issued by the central bank gets official backing. The cNGN is aimed at remittances, trade, and financial inclusion, promising instant global naira transfers at low cost.

Furthermore, Nigeria’s SEC and other bodies are crafting rules: the SEC has regulatory incubation for crypto startups and classifies tokens either as securities or not. The CBN in Dec 2023 issued VASP guidelines signaling that exchanges and payment providers dealing in crypto must register and follow AML rules. They even updated banking guidelines to accommodate “virtual assets” transactions – an implicit green light for banks to integrate crypto under oversight.

Why Nigeria is Ahead: It recognized earlier than most that outright bans were driving crypto underground, so it’s shifting to a supervisory approach. By embracing cNGN, Nigeria is essentially integrating stablecoins into its national payment system, something even many developed countries haven’t done. This proactive approach, if successful, could inspire other nations to follow (especially those in the CFA zone or others with unstable currencies).

Implications for Thenks: Nigeria is a high-priority market. We should align with initiatives like cNGN – perhaps by using cNGN for local payouts once it’s live, which would likely have low friction if banks support it. Also, obtaining whatever license is required (be it through SEC’s framework or CBN’s, or both) will be key to operating freely. If Thenks can become an early licensed VASP in Nigeria, we gain first-mover advantage in a huge remittance corridor (Nigerian diaspora sent ∼ $20B home in 2022). Partnerships with Nigerian fintechs (maybe those in the Stablecoin Consortium or major exchanges like Yellow Card) will strengthen our position. Finally, Nigeria’s case can serve as proof-of-concept: if stablecoin-powered donations/payouts thrive in Nigeria (with regulatory approval), that model can be presented to other regulators as a safe and effective approach.

Kenya: The Mobile Money Powerhouse Embraces Stablecoins

Adoption: Kenya’s fintech revolution began with mobile money (M-Pesa), and stablecoins are set to ride that infrastructure. Kenyans are quick to adopt technologies that lower costs – and stablecoins are doing exactly that for international transactions. Even without explicit approval, over $2 billion in stablecoin volume flowed through Kenya in 2024 as individuals and businesses sought cheaper, faster payments. Use cases abound: freelancers paid in USDC instead of via high-fee PayPal, families receiving remittances via cUSD instead of Western Union, and merchants sourcing inventory by swapping KES to USDT to pay Chinese exporters. Kenya also hosts innovative projects: the Mercy Corps Ventures pilot showed that gig workers greatly benefited from stablecoin micropayments (fees cut from 7% to ~0.5%, near-instant pay)techcrunch.com. Another example is Kotani Pay’s micro-lending in stablecoins (cKES) to micro-entrepreneurs, indicating even local currency tokens can play a role. All this is supported by Kenya’s ubiquitous mobile money—83% of Kenyans use services like M-Pesa, and companies have built bridges from crypto to those services (Kotani, BitLipa, etc.), effectively bringing stablecoins to anyone with a basic phone.

Regulation: Until recently, Kenya’s stance was cautionary. The Central Bank has warned that crypto isn’t legal tender and isn’t regulated (hence “use at your own risk”). However, the regulatory climate is evolving:

Kenya is likely to enact the VASP law by 2025, which would require Thenks (and any crypto platform) to obtain a license from the CMA or perhaps a new agency. This will cover compliance with FATF standards (KYC/AML, reporting) and consumer protection. Considering Kenya’s emphasis on innovation, the law may be moderately friendly—allowing licensed firms to integrate with mobile money and banking, which is crucial.

Why Kenya is Ahead: Kenya’s leadership is more on the adoption side than regulation so far. Kenyans have demonstrated stablecoins’ utility at scale (aided by that incredible mobile money connectivity). Regulators see both the potential economic benefit and the need to manage risks—hence moving from a stance of silence to actively legislating and taxing. In the broader African context, Kenya often sets fintech trends (like it did with M-Pesa). If Kenya successfully licenses a few crypto companies and integrates them into the financial ecosystem (for instance, allowing an exchange to connect to M-Pesa officially), it will encourage other East African countries to follow suit.

Implications for Thenks: Kenya’s combination of high user readiness and imminent regulation makes it ideal for Thenks to implement pilots and then quickly formalize operations. We should engage with the CMA (perhaps via the Blockchain Association of Kenya) to participate in shaping the VASP rules. Perhaps join the sandbox to trial a Thenks service that links diaspora donations via stablecoin to local charities with CMA oversight. On launch, partnering with Safaricom (M-Pesa) or its API aggregator like MFS Africa could be game-changing – imagine a user in Kenya receiving a Thenks tip directly as an M-Pesa credit in seconds (the backend using stablecoins). That’s a story regulators can get behind, as it aligns with Kenya’s fintech success narrative. Once the VASP license is available, we will pursue it, which will legitimize us in the market and likely grant us access to directly integrate with mobile money (since we’ll be a known quantity under law). Kenya can then serve as an East African hub for us, expanding to neighbors that often look to Kenya’s lead (e.g., Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda).

South Africa: Regulating to Integrate Stablecoins into Mainstream Finance

Adoption: South Africa has a relatively mature crypto market with several exchanges and a growing user base. While initially interest centered on Bitcoin, stablecoins have rapidly gained ground. By late 2023, stablecoins surpassed Bitcoin in trading volume on South African exchanges. This shift is due to people using stablecoins as on/off ramps for arbitrage (taking advantage of price differences in local vs. international markets) and as a USD hedge as the Rand has seen depreciation pressure. Moreover, South African companies involved in international trade are experimenting with settling in USDC to avoid swift delays. We also see local innovation: ZARP, a fully collateralized Rand stablecoin, launched with institutional support (Old Mutual wealth manages its treasury). ZARP, though small (~R60M issued), is a proof of concept that a stablecoin can be integrated with traditional finance – it reportedly had direct fiat redemption through a local bank, and it’s used on-chain for trading and DeFi. South Africa also has a significant remittance outflow to neighboring countries (like sending money to Mozambique, Zimbabwe, etc.). Fintechs are eyeing stablecoins to reduce those remittance costs, and given SA’s relatively good banking infrastructure, converting stablecoins to Rand or other African currencies is becoming easier (some regional exchanges facilitate USDT to local currency trades).

Regulation: South Africa has been proactive in creating a regulatory framework for crypto assets:

Why South Africa is Ahead: Unlike many countries that either banned or ignored crypto, South Africa decided to regulate and integrate. It essentially extended existing financial laws to crypto, thus immediately bringing a measure of oversight. It’s ahead in implementation (requiring licenses now), not just talk. This approach means stablecoins can operate in the open, provided they follow rules – which encourages mainstream financial institutions to explore using them. Additionally, by supporting a homegrown stablecoin (ZARP) through an established institution, SA is testing how stablecoins can complement the Rand system without threatening it. South Africa’s balanced approach—protect investors through licensing, but allow innovation—serves as a model for other countries trying to find the middle ground.

Implications for Thenks: In South Africa, compliance is the ticket to entry. We will need to either partner with an FSP-licensed entity or obtain our own FSP license for crypto intermediary services. Given the process is underway, we should start that licensing journey for Thenks in SA (identifying a locally qualified “Key Individual” for the license, etc.). Once licensed, Thenks can integrate with the formal financial system. For example, we could potentially open accounts with banks to hold client fiat (banks in SA can work with licensed crypto providers now). We could also seek approval to use ZARP or integrate with its issuer for Rand liquidity – offering users an option to receive Rand stablecoins which are 1:1 redeemable in local banks could be attractive for domestic use. On the product side, we might tap into South Africa’s regional role: e.g., enabling a user in SA to tip someone in another African country seamlessly (SA has many foreign workers sending money home; Thenks could be a vehicle for those remittances under a “tip/donation” guise). With regulatory clarity, we can market Thenks as a fully compliant way to transfer value, perhaps appealing to NGOs or businesses in SA that currently face expensive cross-border transfers (like paying suppliers or grants in other African nations).

Additionally, South Africa’s financial community (banks, fintech investors) is more likely to collaborate once we have the proper credentials. We could see partnership with a major bank’s fintech arm, or with telecom companies (MTN is big in fintech and might incorporate stablecoins for their mobile money in other countries; having Thenks as a partner is possible if we’re licensed). Finally, success in SA can open the door to the rest of SADC (Southern African Development Community) – regulators there often consult SARB/FSCA precedents. If Thenks is known to FSCA, it may find smoother entry in places like Namibia, Botswana, etc., in the future.

Ghana: Forward-Looking Experiments and Emerging Regulations

Adoption: Ghana’s crypto adoption has been growing, particularly as the Ghanaian cedi saw high inflation (~50% in 2022). Stablecoins have facilitated about $30B in transactions in a year, ~50% of Ghana’s crypto volume, which is substantial for a 30-million population. Ghanaians use stablecoins for remittances and as a USD hedge, similar to Nigerians, though on a smaller scale. When the cedi rapidly depreciated, many turned to USDT/PAX on peer platforms to preserve value. Local exchanges (like BitSika, etc.) reported increased stablecoin activity.

What puts Ghana on the map is not raw volume but innovation in trials. The Bank of Ghana (BoG) has been proactive:

Regulation: Ghana is in the process of formalizing crypto regulation:

Why Ghana is Ahead: Ghana stands out for actively experimenting with integrating stablecoins into its monetary projects (eCedi trial with stablecoin – few countries have done that). This willingness to collaborate with other central banks (MAS) and the private sector on cutting-edge fintech is forward-looking. Ghana aims to solve real problems (SME credit, trade verification) using a mix of CBDC and stablecoin, which could become a blueprint for other emerging economies. On regulation, while not the first to issue laws, Ghana’s draft guidelines and sandbox show it’s moving methodically and trying to strike a balance between innovation and risk. Many countries haven’t even begun thinking about stablecoins in trade finance – Ghana already did a pilot. That pushes the narrative of stablecoins beyond just speculative trading to practical commerce tools, which is advanced thinking.

Implications for Thenks: Ghana could be an important West African foothold for Thenks, especially given Nigeria’s market is huge but also more competitive. Ghana’s regulators appear accessible via their sandbox – Thenks should consider applying to test our platform in Ghana’s sandbox focusing on, say, NGO remittances or educational donations via stablecoin (something aligned with inclusive finance). If accepted, we’d operate with BoG’s oversight, gather data, and then be well-placed to get a full license when the framework goes live. Gaining BoG’s trust early is invaluable.

Also, Ghana is a gateway to Francophone West Africa (though Ghana itself is Anglophone, it’s surrounded by CFA franc countries). If BoG embraces stablecoins, the BCEAO (Central Bank for Francophone countries) might pay attention. We already see cXOF (Celo’s CFA franc stablecoin) existing, albeit small. If Thenks is present in Ghana and say, supports cXOF transactions to Côte d’Ivoire or Senegal in a sandbox, that could be a case for regional expansion.

Once licensed in Ghana, Thenks can integrate with Ghana’s payment systems (like mobile money MTN MoMo, Vodafone Cash which are common there) similarly to Kenya. Because Ghana’s remittance cost from abroad is high (around 8-10%), demonstrating stablecoin-based donation or tip flows that beat that cost will get regulatory praise. Ghana’s government also has a keen interest in tech startups – we might get support or partnerships (for example, with local telecoms or banks wanting to pilot crypto solutions).

Finally, being regulated in Ghana adds credibility when approaching other African regulators. Ghana is respected for its relatively strong institutions; if they vet and approve Thenks, others might consider that in our favor. Also, any success story out of Ghana (like “Thenks helped reduce SME payment costs by X% in BoG’s pilot”) can be leveraged in discussions with policymakers elsewhere.

Rwanda: Small Market, Big Aspirations in Fintech and Stablecoins

Adoption: Rwanda’s crypto and stablecoin adoption is currently modest – the market is smaller compared to Nigeria, Kenya, or South Africa. However, interest is growing, particularly in the tech community and among NGOs. Rwanda’s economy is highly digitized in payments (lots of mobile money usage, QR code payments, etc.), setting the stage for future stablecoin use. Given Rwanda’s relatively stable but small currency (Rwandan franc), stablecoins could be appealing for cross-border trade (Rwandan importers might prefer holding USD stablecoins to pay Chinese suppliers, for instance).

One area where stablecoins might see uptake is in development aid and NGO funding. Kigali is a regional hub for development organizations. If those organizations start using stablecoins for efficiency (as some are piloting elsewhere), Rwanda could see inbound stablecoin flows increase. Also, Rwanda’s youthful population and growing tech sector (e.g., the government’s ICT initiatives) mean more people experimenting with crypto.

Crucially, Rwanda signaled interest in stablecoins by planning to join the Ghana-Singapore cross-border CBDC/stablecoin project in its next phase. That suggests Rwanda may pilot stablecoin usage (perhaps using a stablecoin like XSGD or even a hypothetical RWF stablecoin) in a controlled environment for trade or remittances. If that goes through, Rwanda would gain first-hand experience with stablecoins’ benefits and technicalities.

Regulation: Rwanda does not yet have dedicated crypto laws, but the central bank (National Bank of Rwanda, NBR) has been studying it. The Ministry of ICT and Innovation has mentioned exploring blockchain for financial services. In 2022, Rwanda’s Central Bank said it was researching a CBDC and also consulting on crypto regulations. They haven’t made any prohibitive moves – trading crypto is unofficially tolerated though not regulated.

Rwanda launched a Fintech Regulatory Sandbox in 2021 to encourage innovative financial solutions. It’s likely open to crypto projects – in fact, one of the sandbox’s first cohort companies was reportedly a blockchain-based solution for carbon credits. WeWire (the firm in Ghana’s sandbox for remittances) also indicated interest in Rwanda’s sandbox. So, Rwanda is quietly allowing experimentation.

We expect that Rwanda will eventually either incorporate crypto into existing payments licensing or create a new framework (possibly following guidance from organizations like the IMF – Rwanda often works closely with IMF/World Bank on financial reforms). They might also take cues from Kenya and Ghana’s approaches, given regional ties (Rwanda is in E. Africa Community with Kenya, and also in commonwealth like Ghana).

Why Rwanda is Ahead (or can be): While Rwanda is not “ahead” in implementation yet, it is ahead in vision and willingness to learn. Its participation in cutting-edge trials and the active encouragement of fintech innovation signal a readiness to embrace stablecoins if proven useful. Rwanda’s leadership in digital public infrastructure (like their nationwide digital ID and cashless push) means if stablecoins can align with their broader goals (e.g., making Rwanda a financial hub or boosting inclusion), they will move fast to adopt supportive regulations.

Rwanda also tends to punch above its weight in attracting pilots by global tech firms (for instance, testing drone deliveries, next-gen mobility, etc.). They could serve as a proving ground for stablecoin applications in humanitarian aid or inter-African trade, areas of strong interest for them (they want to be a trade logistics hub).

Implications for Thenks: Rwanda may be a smaller market for direct revenue, but strategically it’s a testbed and gateway in Central/East Africa. If Thenks were to facilitate, say, stablecoin donations to Rwandan healthcare projects with government buy-in, it could showcase our platform’s impact. We should consider engaging with the Rwandan sandbox to test an NGO-focused use case: e.g., a charity giving UBI (universal basic income) stipends via stablecoins to refugees in Rwanda – NBR might sandbox that as it overlaps with their inclusion goals.

Being an early mover in Rwanda also has PR benefits: success stories from Rwanda (often lauded for good governance) could be showcased internationally. It could help Thenks refine its model in a smaller, controlled environment before scaling to larger populations.

On the regulatory front, we should maintain close contact with NBR, perhaps through forums like the AFI (Alliance for Financial Inclusion) where Rwanda is active. If we can demonstrate to Rwandan regulators how Thenks keeps transactions transparent (blockchain auditability) and low-cost, they might champion it as a model for others. Also, Rwanda’s likely requirement will be to have a locally registered entity or partner – we could collaborate with a Rwandan fintech (maybe a mobile money provider or a payments startup in their tech incubator) to enter the market collaboratively.

United Arab Emirates (UAE): A Global Crypto Hub Shaping Stablecoin Usage

Adoption: The UAE, particularly Dubai and Abu Dhabi, is rapidly becoming a global center for crypto and fintech. While retail usage of stablecoins in domestic commerce is not common (the UAE dirham is stable and heavily used), business and trading adoption is significant. Many crypto exchanges and high-net-worth individuals have relocated to UAE, bringing large stablecoin flows. The UAE’s remittance market (one of the largest in the world, due to its migrant workforce) is a prime candidate for stablecoin disruption – indeed, companies like Ripple have partnered with UAE firms to streamline remittances to Asia and Africa using digital assets. We’re seeing stablecoins being used quietly for B2B settlements; for example, some gold traders in Dubai might settle in USDC to avoid cross-border banking delays.

Another area is DeFi and trading: UAE hosts numerous crypto funds and traders who use stablecoins as their operating capital. This makes UAE one of the higher per-capita users of stablecoins, albeit concentrated in professional circles. On the public front, the government is interested in stablecoins for innovation in finance – e.g., the central bank’s CBDC project (Project Aber with Saudi Arabia, and now mBridge with Asian banks) considers interoperability with other digital currencies, potentially including regulated stablecoins.

Regulation: The UAE has among the most advanced crypto regulatory frameworks:

The UAE also recently exempted crypto transactions from VAT, clarifying their stance of treating them akin to currency (VAT-free like forex). That’s a minor but telling policy decision that makes using crypto (including stablecoins) more frictionless.

Why UAE is Ahead: UAE offers a complete regulatory ecosystem: they license and supervise crypto firms (over 30 have been licensed in ADGM and VARA already, including global exchanges). They directly addressed stablecoins in regulation (few jurisdictions have dedicated stablecoin rules yet – UAE does, via CBUAE and VARA). They also commit government resources to encourage crypto – e.g., DMCC (Dubai free zone) launched a Crypto Center where stablecoin projects can incubate.

This dual approach – strict rules (no algos, reserve requirements) but welcoming licensed activity – positions UAE as a safe but innovative hub. It’s ahead in providing legal certainty: a stablecoin business knows exactly what is expected (e.g., if we wanted to issue a Dirham stablecoin, we know we must be a licensed Payment Token Service Provider under CBUAE).

Implications for Thenks: For Thenks, having a presence or partnerships in the UAE could unlock access to global markets and capital:

In summary, the UAE combines a thriving crypto market with a clear regulatory regime, making it an ideal operational hub. Thenks will leverage that by aligning fully with their regulations (using only approved stablecoins, adhering to their advertising/content codes, etc.) and establishing a licensed entity there if feasible. The credibility and networking from being in the UAE’s crypto hub can greatly accelerate our global partnerships and recognition.

Singapore: Setting Gold Standards for Stablecoin Regulation

Adoption: Singapore’s crypto ecosystem is vibrant but carefully monitored. Stablecoin usage in Singapore is significant in the fintech and trading space. For example, XSGD (Singapore dollar stablecoin) has processed over 5 billion SGD in transactions as of mid-2023 – indicating it’s being used for trading and perhaps some local transactions. Many international crypto firms have operations in Singapore, so there’s a flow of stablecoins (primarily USDC/USDT) through the city. Retail use of stablecoins (like paying at merchants) isn’t common yet – though there have been trials (e.g., some stores accepted XSGD or crypto via apps). The MAS itself did an experiment where they issued “purpose-bound” digital SGD for retail usage at a festival, which is like a stablecoin in function.

Singapore’s significance is more as a bridge between traditional finance and crypto. Institutions in Singapore (banks, payment companies) are exploring stablecoins for settlement and cross-border purposes. For instance, DBS Bank (largest local bank) launched a pilot in 2023 to test foreign exchange settlement using a stablecoin on their private exchange. Also, companies like Temasek (sovereign fund) invested in stablecoin projects (they were part of Diem’s consortium, and now looking at others). So, the adoption here is about integration with mainstream financial services.

Regulation: Singapore’s MAS has been very forward-thinking:

Why Singapore is Ahead: Singapore arguably has the most clear and comprehensive stablecoin regulatory regime in the world as of 2025. They didn’t ban crypto after high-profile collapses (e.g., Terra/Luna which had a big presence in SG); instead they doubled down on regulating it properly. By setting quality standards (e.g., requiring 100% reserve in same currency, timely redemption), MAS is addressing the exact risks stablecoins pose (like bank-run scenarios, or depegging from poor reserves). Once this framework becomes law (expected to be enacted in 2024), any stablecoin meeting MAS’s requirements will be seen as highly trustworthy – possibly spurring adoption by institutions globally, not just in Singapore.

Singapore also tightly integrates crypto regulation with mainstream finance – e.g., stablecoin issuers might be banks or fintechs that also have e-money licenses. MAS treats something like USDC almost akin to how they treat a foreign currency: they monitor it, and if a firm in SG issues it, they’ll supervise. This blending of crypto in the existing regime (instead of separate silo) is advanced.

Implications for Thenks: If Thenks targets Asia, Singapore is the natural base. But to operate there, we must be top-notch in compliance and technology – MAS will scrutinize everything from our cybersecurity to our onboarding process. We should perhaps partner with a local entity or hire experienced compliance personnel in SG to navigate the licensing.

Once licensed (or even in principle approved), Thenks would benefit immensely:

Furthermore, Singapore could serve as our gateway to Southeast Asia. Many ASEAN countries (Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines) are watching MAS’s approach. If Thenks is licensed in SG, it’s easier to expand services to expats and cross-border flows involving those countries, possibly even without a local license initially (for example, serving a Filipino user in Singapore to send stablecoins home – MAS covers our SG side, and Philippines has a friendly stance on crypto remittances, with many licensed crypto remittance companies there).

In summary, Singapore demands highest regulatory compliance, but rewards with a thriving, well-regulated environment and connectivity to the world’s financial networks. Thenks should aim to meet MAS’s gold standards (perhaps even getting an ISO27001 certification or similar to show we follow best practices, which MAS likes). By doing so, we not only get the license but also improve our operations globally.

United Kingdom: Integrating Stablecoins into the Future of Payments

Adoption: In the UK, stablecoin usage among consumers is still low, but there’s strong interest from fintechs and even the government in leveraging stablecoins for payments. The UK has a very fintech-friendly market (think Revolut, Wise, etc.), and some of these players have dabbled in stablecoin or crypto offerings. For example, fintech startup Checkout.com ran trials settling merchant payments in USDC, finding it could cut settlement time from days to minutes. On the consumer side, crypto adoption in the UK is moderate (~5-10% have used it), with stablecoins mostly used by traders so far. But the UK government has explicitly stated stablecoins could become widely used for retail payments, and they want to be prepared to capture economic benefits of that.

One possible catalyst for UK stablecoin adoption is Big Tech or large fintech issuers. PayPal just launched a USD stablecoin (though in US for now); if they extended that to UK customers, that would boost usage. The UK’s open banking and Faster Payments infrastructure are excellent, so stablecoins will only gain ground if they offer something extra (like 24/7 international reach, or programmability). Still, there’s exploration: Barclay’s reportedly invested in a stablecoin startup, and the London Stock Exchange is looking at tokenized assets (which could use stablecoin for settlement).

Regulation: The UK is in a transitional phase of shaping specific cryptoasset laws:

Why UK is Ahead: The UK’s advantage is regulatory clarity in progress coupled with political will to embrace stablecoins. The fact that stablecoins were written into a major Act of Parliament (FSMA) is significant – few countries have that at legislative level yet. The UK is setting up the legal scaffolding so that when stablecoin usage booms, it won’t be in a regulatory void. They’ve also signaled internationally (through forums like the G7) that they aim to be a leader in safe crypto adoption.

The UK’s approach is measured: not as liberal as Dubai, but not as restrictive as say, India (which has high crypto taxes). It’s somewhat akin to the EU’s MiCA but with a focus on payments. Also, the UK’s experimentation with sandboxes (they had a very successful FCA sandbox allowing some crypto trials) and Critical Benchmarks (thinking if stablecoins could be used in settlement) shows they like evidence-based policy.

Implications for Thenks: The UK can be both a market and a stamp of quality:

To summarizing the strategic position: The UK is aligning its laws such that regulated stablecoin usage becomes mainstream. Thenks should aim to be among the first fully compliant stablecoin-based payment platforms in the UK, carving a niche in cross-border micro-payments and donations. The combination of London’s financial clout and our innovative tech could open partnerships with banks (some UK banks might eventually issue their own stablecoins – Thenks could carry those on our platform) and large enterprises (imagine helping a British corporation send many small payments to contractors abroad via stablecoins – easier with clear law). We will keep close watch on HM Treasury and FCA communications to time our moves (possibly participating in consultations to voice a fintech perspective, showing Thenks as a responsible actor).

Having analyzed these country contexts, we see a pattern: Regulators globally are converging on requiring stablecoins to be safe (fully reserved, transparent) and providers like Thenks to be licensed and compliant. This is not a deterrent but rather a blueprint – by aligning with these expectations early, Thenks can expand confidently and gain regulator trust, turning stablecoins from a perceived risk into a widely accepted tool. Each country spotlight reaffirms our strategy to invest in compliance and partnerships in parallel with tech innovation.

7. Strategic Recommendations for Thenks to Get Ahead with Stablecoins

Drawing from the market landscape, infrastructure capabilities, and regulatory insights above, this section outlines strategic recommendations for Thenks across product development, legal/compliance strategy, technical implementation, and partnerships. The goal is to position Thenks not just to adapt to the current environment, but to lead in the tipping/donations space by leveraging stablecoins intelligently and proactively meeting upcoming challenges.

Product Strategy: User-Centric Design with Stablecoin Power Under the Hood

Overall, the product should make stablecoin usage so intuitive that users focus on the human connection of tipping/giving, not the mechanics of the transfer.

These partnerships can be formal (like a written agent agreement) or informal (we route transactions through them and they charge a fee). It’s important to structure them with clear liability delineation and ideally with an eye that we eventually replace reliance with our own license once feasible.

Essentially, we aim to become known as “the compliant stablecoin payments platform”. This will attract not only regulators’ trust but also big enterprise partners who only deal with compliant companies (e.g., a multinational NGO or corporation would choose Thenks over a non-licensed competitor if they see we are properly regulated).

Technical Strategy: Building a Robust, Scalable and Interoperable Platform

In summary, the tech strategy is to build a secure, scalable platform that flexibly works across currencies and rails, giving us efficiency and future-proofing. By quietly doing complex multi-chain operations behind a simple interface, Thenks can offer a service that feels magically smooth to users and highly reliable to partners/regulators.

Partnership and Ecosystem Strategy: Leveraging Networks for Growth

In conclusion, Thenks should not operate in isolation but plug into an ecosystem of fintech, crypto, and mission-driven organizations. By being collaborative and proactive, we multiply our reach far beyond what direct user acquisition would achieve. Partnerships can provide distribution (through integrated platforms), trust (through endorsements by known brands), and regulatory cover (through joint efforts with incumbents).

We must approach partnerships with a win-win mindset: what’s in it for them (e.g., mobile money providers get more international flow, NGOs get efficiency, stablecoin issuers get volume and legitimacy) and ensure Thenks captures value either through fees or user growth in each arrangement. With the above strategies, Thenks can accelerate from a startup to a critical node in the global payments network, known for doing good (facilitating helpful small payments) and doing it right (compliant and secure).

By executing on these strategic recommendations – refining our product with stablecoin superpowers, doubling down on compliance, engineering a flexible robust platform, and weaving a network of high-impact partnerships – Thenks can truly get ahead of the game. We’ll be capitalizing on stablecoins’ strengths (speed, low cost, global reach) while proactively managing their challenges (regulatory uncertainty, integration hurdles). In doing so, Thenks can become synonymous with instant, affordable, and trusted cross-border micro-payments, tapping into a massive underserved market and building a defensible leadership position as the world increasingly turns to stablecoins and digital currencies for everyday value transfer.

Sources:

Citations

[

Understanding Stable Coins in Crypto: A Timeline of Their Evolution - BlockApps Inc.

https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/

](https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/#:~:text=* 2014,backed)[

Understanding Stable Coins in Crypto: A Timeline of Their Evolution - BlockApps Inc.

https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/

](https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/#:~:text=This article will trace the,and the digital asset revolution)[

Understanding Stable Coins in Crypto: A Timeline of Their Evolution - BlockApps Inc.

https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/

](https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/#:~:text=Tether ,94 (2022)[

Understanding Stable Coins in Crypto: A Timeline of Their Evolution - BlockApps Inc.

https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/

](https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/#:~:text=Tether ,94 (2022)[

Understanding Stable Coins in Crypto: A Timeline of Their Evolution - BlockApps Inc.

https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/

](https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/#:~:text=– Market Cap%3A %2441,from March 2023 depegging incident)[

Cryptocurrency payments key to lowering cross-border remittance charges and boosting microwork uptake in Africa, study shows | TechCrunch

https://techcrunch.com/2022/02/23/cryptocurrency-payments-key-to-lowering-cross-border-remittance-charges-and-boosting-microwork-uptake-in-africa-study-shows/

](https://techcrunch.com/2022/02/23/cryptocurrency-payments-key-to-lowering-cross-border-remittance-charges-and-boosting-microwork-uptake-in-africa-study-shows/#:~:text=However%2C the MCV study notes,border payments)[

Sub-Saharan Africa: Nigeria Takes #2, South Africa Grows Crypto-TradFi

https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/subsaharan-africa-crypto-adoption-2024/

](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/subsaharan-africa-crypto-adoption-2024/#:~:text=key figures shaping Africa’s crypto,20 countries on the continent)[

The Stablecoin Sandwich: Solving for Cross-Border Payments

https://www.dynamic.xyz/blog/the-stablecoin-sandwich

](https://www.dynamic.xyz/blog/the-stablecoin-sandwich#:~:text=Now let’s dig into the,how they manage their funds)[

The Stablecoin Sandwich: Solving for Cross-Border Payments

https://www.dynamic.xyz/blog/the-stablecoin-sandwich

](https://www.dynamic.xyz/blog/the-stablecoin-sandwich#:~:text=1. On,custody%2C delegated access and operations)[

https://www.sidley.com/en/insights/events/2020/05/-/media/6fd07e9788394b57877b90f6254d0416.ashx

](https://www.sidley.com/en/insights/events/2020/05/-/media/6fd07e9788394b57877b90f6254d0416.ashx#:~:text=Treatment of Stablecoins – FinCEN,be viewed the same way)[

Regional Evaluation: Kenya Local Node - Regional Evaluations - Scroll Governance Forum

https://forum.scroll.io/t/regional-evaluation-kenya-local-node/728

](https://forum.scroll.io/t/regional-evaluation-kenya-local-node/728#:~:text=Digital Asset Tax ,It provides essential insights into)

All Sources

[

blockapps

](https://blockapps.net/blog/understanding-stable-coins-in-crypto-a-timeline-of-their-evolution/#:~:text=* 2014,backed)[

techcrunch

](https://techcrunch.com/2022/02/23/cryptocurrency-payments-key-to-lowering-cross-border-remittance-charges-and-boosting-microwork-uptake-in-africa-study-shows/#:~:text=However%2C the MCV study notes,border payments)[

chainalysis

](https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/subsaharan-africa-crypto-adoption-2024/#:~:text=key figures shaping Africa’s crypto,20 countries on the continent)[

dynamic

](https://www.dynamic.xyz/blog/the-stablecoin-sandwich#:~:text=Now let’s dig into the,how they manage their funds)[

sidley

](https://www.sidley.com/en/insights/events/2020/05/-/media/6fd07e9788394b57877b90f6254d0416.ashx#:~:text=Treatment of Stablecoins – FinCEN,be viewed the same way)[

forum.scroll

](https://forum.scroll.io/t/regional-evaluation-kenya-local-node/728#:~:text=Digital Asset Tax ,It provides essential insights into)